The Three Thirds-Point of View PDF Print E-mail
Written by Tannith Perry   
Saturday, 25 March 2006

  As you read in the title, there are three types of limited third-person. The most common one is third-person limited. It is much like first-person as the story is told from one person’s point of view. The author is limited to the inside of one person’s head and cannot include information that the focus character doesn’t know. In this pov, the author (who is the true narrator) cannot tell the reader things that the character doesn’t know. If your character doesn’t think he is humble, then that insight would not be included.

 The biggest difference between third-limited and first-person is that a story told in first-person must be told through the mouth of the narrating character. The language of the narrator (the character from whose pov we see the world) is the language used in the story. In third-person, the narrator (the author) may tell the story in whatever language he or she wants to use. This means that even if your main character is a rural woman working on her GED, you can describe her life and her feelings in the most elevated, articulate language you can manage. Rabbit, Run, by John Updike is a story about a former basketball player who is neither extremely intelligent nor articulate. Updike uses this point of view so we see the world as Rabbit (the main character) does, but his experiences are filtered through Updike’s beautiful language. In some places, Updike blends his voice with that of Rabbit, giving the reader a more enhanced sense of intimacy. This type of point of view has many of the advantage and disadvantages of first person. The reader is able to get very close to one character, but we are also limited in knowledge and experience to one person’s perception

            Serial limited third-person is a variation on this technique. It is just like limited third-person, but the pov moves from one character to another. Margaret Attwood’s short story “Uglypuss” uses this technique, allowing the reader to see a lover’s quarrel from both characters’ point of views. Using this pov can free the author to get inside many different character’s heads without confusing readers. If characters with very different views of the world populate your story, this may be a good choice.  The only downfall is by reducing the time a reader spends with each viewpoint, you risk lessening a reader’s sense of intimacy with the characters.

            The final variation on third-person is third-person objective. Perhaps the most difficult of all the povs to master, in third-person objective the author makes absolutely no judgments and stays outside the heads of all the characters. Even small comments like, “he was handsome,” should be avoided, since they are telling instead of showing. His manly beauty could be shown in the reactions of the females at his job or his comments to a friend. This technique is like watching a film or a play. The audience must ascertain the feelings and thoughts of the characters solely through action and dialogue. While most authors do not choose to regularly use this type of point of view, it is an excellent exercise in learning how to show and not tell. For an example, read “Hills like White Elephants,” by Hemmingway. 

Comments
Add New RSS
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
 
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.22 Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 11 July 2006 )
 
< Prev   Next >

Related Blogs